Seen instead of reported public referent acceptance and you can connection commitment and you may dedication

Partner choices during the online dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Of appealing to terrible: Disenchantment that have an enchanting partner. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]

Fiore, A great. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily from inside the dating: When can you such as for example anyone like on your own? CHI, fulfilling with the person things in calculating assistance. 1317-1374. [ Links ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and incompatibility within the youngsters’ peer and you may aunt relationships. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may incompatible relationship (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Elizabeth., & Christensen, An excellent. (2004). Wild birds regarding an effective feather otherwise strange wild birds? Links certainly one of identification dimensions, similarity, and ily Psychology, 4, 564-574. [ Links ]

Gaunt, R. (2006). Pair similarity and you can relationship pleasure: Was similar partners delighted. Diary regarding Identity, 74, 1401-1420. [ Backlinks ]

Goffman, E. (1952). Towards cooling the target aside: Certain element of variation so you can failure. Psychiatry, 15, 451-463. [ Links ]

Gonzaga, G. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, overlap, and you will relationships pleasure in the relationships and you will married couples. Log away from Identification and you will Personal Psychology, 93, 34-48. [ Links ]

Personal Relationships, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, Age., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Echo, mirror: The necessity of looks into the everyday life. Albany: State https://internationalwomen.net/sv/spanska-kvinnor/ College or university of brand new York Push. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Coordinating theory. Into the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia away from individual matchmaking (Vol. 2, pp. 10651067). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Yards., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and you may close relations: Current research. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and in conflict relationship (pp. 91-117). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A good., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you may sorting inside internet dating. Western Financial Feedback, 100, 130-163. [ Website links ]

Houran, J., Lange, Roentgen., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Do on line relationship screening performs? An assessment from first proof getting a publicized ‘predictive model of erican Journal out-of Therapy, six, 507-526. [ Links ]

Houts, R. Yards., Robins, E., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility while the growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Links ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The early relationship roots out of conjugal distress and separation. Current Recommendations when you look at the Mental Science, 10, 116-119. [ Hyperlinks ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Addition. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you can in conflict dating (pp. 1-7). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Meters. R. (2009)patibility. Into the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia off individual matchmaking (Vol. 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]

Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). New matching hypothesis reexamined. Diary out-of Identity and you will Public Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Links ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). New longitudinal span of relationship high quality and balances: A look at concept, methods, and lookup. Mental Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Links ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1997). Neuroticism, marital communication, and also the trajectory out of marital satisfaction. Journal regarding Identity and you can Social Therapy, 72, 1075-1092. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (2005). Contextual affects toward relationships: Effects to have plan and intervention. Current Guidelines in Psychological Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Website links ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, An excellent., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, Grams. Peterson, D.Roentgen. (1983). Taking a look at personal matchmaking. In the H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A beneficial. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Personal relationship (pp. 20-67). Nyc: Freeman. [ Links ]