Background Belonging: Just how Stereotypical Signs Effect Gender Involvement in the Computers Technology

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., and you may Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Positions 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A great., Montoya, Good. K., and you may Jiang, L. (2017). Why are Particular Base sphere A great deal more Gender Balanced Than the others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–35. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you may Hudson, L. (2013). The new Stereotypical Computer Scientist: Gendered news Representations given that a barrier so you can Inclusion for women. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Positions 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, Age., and you will Lo, L. (2013). Create gender-technology Stereotypes Predict Research Personality and you will Research Community Goals One of Student Research Discipline? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16 (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende from inside the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Pupils into the math, computer system research, science and you will techology (STEM) fields . Recovered out-of

Diekman, An effective. B., Steinberg, Yards., Brown, Elizabeth. Roentgen., Belanger, A good. L., and Clark, Elizabeth. K. (2017). An objective Congruity Model of Character Entryway, Wedding, and Leave: Expertise Communal Purpose Processes for the Base Gender Openings. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, A great. H., and Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Concept off Prejudice into the Female Leaders. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step gГјzel seksi Sudan kadД±nlar three.573

Eagly, A good. H., and you may Timber, W. (2012). “Personal Character Theory,” inside the Manual out-of Ideas off Personal Therapy, Volume II. Editors P. van Lange, Good. Kruglanski, and you may Elizabeth. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, A. A good., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., and you can West, K. (2020). Exactly how Gender and you may Battle Stereotypes Impact the Improvement Students in the STEM: Professors’ Biased Analysis out-of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Applicants. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Trip, Letter. Yards., Hyde, J. S., and Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national Habits away from Gender Variations in Math: A good Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equivalence Bureau Pantry Work environment (2017). Gender Equality White Report (Share Version. Tokyo, Japan: Light paper toward gender equality 2017 . Recovered off

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. A great., and you will Brooks, An excellent. W. (2015)pared so you can Dudes, Women Examine Elite Creativity due to the fact Equally Attainable, however, Quicker Desirable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. You S A. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Gray, J. A good., and McN). The newest Neuropsychology out of Nervousness: An enquiry into the Services of one’s pal System. Oxford: Oxford School Push .

Greenwald, A. Grams., McGhee, D. E., and you will Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Computing Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: Brand new Implicit Relationship Take to. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.six.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you will Lee, C. Meters. (2003). Examining the newest Authenticity off Notice Construal Scales. Humm Res 30 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, Meters. Age., and you will Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Match Construction. Classification Techniques. Intergroup Relations 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, A beneficial., Kano, K., Minamizaki, An effective., McKay, E., and you will Yokoyama, H. M. (2019). Adult Egalitarian Thinking for the Gender Positions Affect Agreement towards Girls Bringing Stem sphere during the university in Japan. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A good., Kano, K., Inoue, A good., McKay, E., and you can Yokoyama, H. Meters. (2020). Gender-biased Social Impression from Base fields, Concentrating on the brand new Determine of Egalitarian Perceptions towards the Gender Positions. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/2.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, Grams., Dukala, K., and Szastok, Yards. (2020). The fresh Stem Scholar: Immediately following Graduation, Visitors Currently Disagree in Occupations Outcomes, Attributions to achieve your goals, and you may Need Jobs Services. J. Soc. Circumstances 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, Yards. (2016). Cultural Differences in Questionnaire Answering: Things and Expertise in the Study of Impulse Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386